I admit to (like Jennifer Gonzalez) not quite understanding the MakerSpace phenomenon. For awhile, it totally seemed like every school near me was racing to build one. I thought it a fad and to some degree I still think that way. My biggest criticism has been that the learning for some projects I've seen has seemingly ended far before the end of the project. But I'm a reformed skeptic.
I am so impressed by the thinking going on because this project. Makerspace director, Michael Darfler, has been an enormous help in helping the kids and me iterate this project. Thanks too to Dave Thomas for helping the kids with the many tools in the MakerSpace. The depth of student thinking going on in this project has only increased since they've started. I've discovered a couple of things. 1) A good makerspace project takes time. 2) Creative thinking needs to be connected to content at depth. I'm convinced that students are learning key concepts about revolutions at a deeper level because of the project. Here are some pictures of the kids at work.
The questions they are asking about content are frequent, intelligent and sometimes even profound. I'll long remember some of the "aha" moments I've seen because of these projects. Having to compare and contrast revolutions and present that learning visually through a physical metaphor has provoked some of the best thinking I've seen all year in a class of very impressive thinkers.
Projects are due this Thursday. I'll share them.